1
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
History
24104 readers
121 users here now
Welcome to c/history! History is written by the posters.
c/history is a comm for discussion about history so feel free to talk and post about articles, books, videos, events or historical figures you find interesting
Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.
Do not post reactionary or imperialist takes (criticism is fine, but don't pull nonsense from whatever chud author is out there).
When sharing historical facts, remember to provide credible souces or citations.
Historical Disinformation will be removed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
I had to deal with someone in my life who said something to effect of "if you're condemning modern colonization, why don't also condemn the Viking conquest/colonization of England?".
What I said to him was that while I don't know the specifics of that era, let me ask you... can you identify the continuing legacies of that colonization? Ongoing material problems? Can you point to how that still harms English people or helps Norwegians to this day? Pretty obviously, the answer is no. The viking conquest of the English coast doesn't really impact us today in a meaningful way. However, there are a whole host of very real issues that impact colonized people to this very day. So many problems that modern colonialism + capitalism have caused, and basically none have been made right.
The point about bringing up modern colonialism isn't to wag our fingers at the evil mayos (though that is fun). It's to highlight how the people there still are haunted by the effects. Kinda similar to how while as Marxists we may find the bourgeoisie to be immoral, ultimately our critique of capitalism lies in the system itself and not on the morals of individual actors.