1164
I could get that for you, but I won't. (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
390 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

Yes.

If you can't drink milk, don't drink milk. Drink the coffee without the milk. Or drink water or wine or tea or whatever else they serve.
When did a lack of little luxury accommodations like these milk substitutes become intolerance?

Does stocking milk ethically require that you stock alternatives for those who want something like milk, but can't have it?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Intolerance would be getting mad at someone for asking milk alternatives, which is what's criticized here.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Not sure what America has to do with what I said. Don't try generalizing people, it's just discriminating for no reason and it doesn't work.

    I was refering to @FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 's comment being aggressive and upset with the "Putain, non". It's just conservative because clearly they know what consumers really want, and it's not change, right, right?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Exactly. If someone wants or needs to avoid certain products, that’s great. There’s plenty of options. But it’s not a restaurant’s job to cater to every whim. They can’t always have everything.

    I can’t have fish. My brother is allergic to peanuts. So I eat dishes without fish, he eats them without peanuts. I’m not going to ask for the ‘fishless salmon’.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent