▲ 104 ▼ Carney pledges $150M boost to 'underfunded' CBC (www.cbc.ca) submitted 2 years ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/canadapolitics@lemmy.ca 39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -11 points 2 years ago (15 children) Most people get their news from alternative sources anyway. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] Jhex@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (8 children) Which has proven catastrophic... But i guess that's what you like? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -2 points 2 years ago (7 children) No. I hate it. But pushing funding into corporate media is going to exacerbate that issue is the problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] can@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago into corporate media I usually hear that to refer to privately owned media, which this isn't. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (5 children) So your solution is total corporate ownership of any and all news outlets? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -4 points 2 years ago (4 children) Honestly man, I don’t actually have a good solution to this. It’s a shitty situation our modern media has backed itself into. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (3 children) Well doubling down on what caused the problem is not likely a good solution permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] can@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) They acknowledged my points so I appreciated that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m a big enough man to acknowledge when I’m wrong. Lord knows it happens all the time. My frustration comes from these already tried solutions that aren’t going to solve the issue. Which is that the people you need to convince aren’t going to trust a government funded news source at this point. Not that privatized media is any better for actual factual journalism. You see what I’m saying? The only good journalism now is from books that are well cited, which are hard to actually produce and 99 percent of people don’t read. That’s why this frustrates me so much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Which is that the people you need to convince aren’t going to trust a government funded news source at this point. Which is why we need to reframe it more accurately. They government doesn't fund it: we do. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (5 children) Like facebook! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -5 points 2 years ago* (4 children) Yes. Sadly, yes. And they’ll say “well this is liberal propaganda on cnn because look at how much money they gave them.” So this whole exercise is futile. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (3 children) When i go to the doctor I pay no attention to their medical advice, I always get sicker and sicker, see how doctors suck?? Circular logic is circular permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -3 points 2 years ago (2 children) You understand that doctors and media are wildly different things right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's called an analogy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -3 points 2 years ago Yeah but analogies are supposed to be at least comparable. What you’re doing is bad faith mixed with stupidity. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (8 children) Which has proven catastrophic... But i guess that's what you like? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -2 points 2 years ago (7 children) No. I hate it. But pushing funding into corporate media is going to exacerbate that issue is the problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] can@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago into corporate media I usually hear that to refer to privately owned media, which this isn't. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (5 children) So your solution is total corporate ownership of any and all news outlets? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -4 points 2 years ago (4 children) Honestly man, I don’t actually have a good solution to this. It’s a shitty situation our modern media has backed itself into. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (3 children) Well doubling down on what caused the problem is not likely a good solution permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] can@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) They acknowledged my points so I appreciated that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m a big enough man to acknowledge when I’m wrong. Lord knows it happens all the time. My frustration comes from these already tried solutions that aren’t going to solve the issue. Which is that the people you need to convince aren’t going to trust a government funded news source at this point. Not that privatized media is any better for actual factual journalism. You see what I’m saying? The only good journalism now is from books that are well cited, which are hard to actually produce and 99 percent of people don’t read. That’s why this frustrates me so much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Which is that the people you need to convince aren’t going to trust a government funded news source at this point. Which is why we need to reframe it more accurately. They government doesn't fund it: we do. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -2 points 2 years ago (7 children) No. I hate it. But pushing funding into corporate media is going to exacerbate that issue is the problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] can@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago into corporate media I usually hear that to refer to privately owned media, which this isn't. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (5 children) So your solution is total corporate ownership of any and all news outlets? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -4 points 2 years ago (4 children) Honestly man, I don’t actually have a good solution to this. It’s a shitty situation our modern media has backed itself into. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (3 children) Well doubling down on what caused the problem is not likely a good solution permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] can@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) They acknowledged my points so I appreciated that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m a big enough man to acknowledge when I’m wrong. Lord knows it happens all the time. My frustration comes from these already tried solutions that aren’t going to solve the issue. Which is that the people you need to convince aren’t going to trust a government funded news source at this point. Not that privatized media is any better for actual factual journalism. You see what I’m saying? The only good journalism now is from books that are well cited, which are hard to actually produce and 99 percent of people don’t read. That’s why this frustrates me so much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Which is that the people you need to convince aren’t going to trust a government funded news source at this point. Which is why we need to reframe it more accurately. They government doesn't fund it: we do. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago into corporate media I usually hear that to refer to privately owned media, which this isn't. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (5 children) So your solution is total corporate ownership of any and all news outlets? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -4 points 2 years ago (4 children) Honestly man, I don’t actually have a good solution to this. It’s a shitty situation our modern media has backed itself into. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (3 children) Well doubling down on what caused the problem is not likely a good solution permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] can@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) They acknowledged my points so I appreciated that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m a big enough man to acknowledge when I’m wrong. Lord knows it happens all the time. My frustration comes from these already tried solutions that aren’t going to solve the issue. Which is that the people you need to convince aren’t going to trust a government funded news source at this point. Not that privatized media is any better for actual factual journalism. You see what I’m saying? The only good journalism now is from books that are well cited, which are hard to actually produce and 99 percent of people don’t read. That’s why this frustrates me so much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Which is that the people you need to convince aren’t going to trust a government funded news source at this point. Which is why we need to reframe it more accurately. They government doesn't fund it: we do. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -4 points 2 years ago (4 children) Honestly man, I don’t actually have a good solution to this. It’s a shitty situation our modern media has backed itself into. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (3 children) Well doubling down on what caused the problem is not likely a good solution permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] can@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) They acknowledged my points so I appreciated that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m a big enough man to acknowledge when I’m wrong. Lord knows it happens all the time. My frustration comes from these already tried solutions that aren’t going to solve the issue. Which is that the people you need to convince aren’t going to trust a government funded news source at this point. Not that privatized media is any better for actual factual journalism. You see what I’m saying? The only good journalism now is from books that are well cited, which are hard to actually produce and 99 percent of people don’t read. That’s why this frustrates me so much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Which is that the people you need to convince aren’t going to trust a government funded news source at this point. Which is why we need to reframe it more accurately. They government doesn't fund it: we do. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (3 children) Well doubling down on what caused the problem is not likely a good solution permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] can@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) They acknowledged my points so I appreciated that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m a big enough man to acknowledge when I’m wrong. Lord knows it happens all the time. My frustration comes from these already tried solutions that aren’t going to solve the issue. Which is that the people you need to convince aren’t going to trust a government funded news source at this point. Not that privatized media is any better for actual factual journalism. You see what I’m saying? The only good journalism now is from books that are well cited, which are hard to actually produce and 99 percent of people don’t read. That’s why this frustrates me so much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Which is that the people you need to convince aren’t going to trust a government funded news source at this point. Which is why we need to reframe it more accurately. They government doesn't fund it: we do. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) They acknowledged my points so I appreciated that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m a big enough man to acknowledge when I’m wrong. Lord knows it happens all the time. My frustration comes from these already tried solutions that aren’t going to solve the issue. Which is that the people you need to convince aren’t going to trust a government funded news source at this point. Not that privatized media is any better for actual factual journalism. You see what I’m saying? The only good journalism now is from books that are well cited, which are hard to actually produce and 99 percent of people don’t read. That’s why this frustrates me so much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Which is that the people you need to convince aren’t going to trust a government funded news source at this point. Which is why we need to reframe it more accurately. They government doesn't fund it: we do. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I’m a big enough man to acknowledge when I’m wrong. Lord knows it happens all the time. My frustration comes from these already tried solutions that aren’t going to solve the issue. Which is that the people you need to convince aren’t going to trust a government funded news source at this point. Not that privatized media is any better for actual factual journalism. You see what I’m saying? The only good journalism now is from books that are well cited, which are hard to actually produce and 99 percent of people don’t read. That’s why this frustrates me so much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Which is that the people you need to convince aren’t going to trust a government funded news source at this point. Which is why we need to reframe it more accurately. They government doesn't fund it: we do. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Which is that the people you need to convince aren’t going to trust a government funded news source at this point. Which is why we need to reframe it more accurately. They government doesn't fund it: we do. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (5 children) Like facebook! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -5 points 2 years ago* (4 children) Yes. Sadly, yes. And they’ll say “well this is liberal propaganda on cnn because look at how much money they gave them.” So this whole exercise is futile. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (3 children) When i go to the doctor I pay no attention to their medical advice, I always get sicker and sicker, see how doctors suck?? Circular logic is circular permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -3 points 2 years ago (2 children) You understand that doctors and media are wildly different things right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's called an analogy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -3 points 2 years ago Yeah but analogies are supposed to be at least comparable. What you’re doing is bad faith mixed with stupidity. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -5 points 2 years ago* (4 children) Yes. Sadly, yes. And they’ll say “well this is liberal propaganda on cnn because look at how much money they gave them.” So this whole exercise is futile. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (3 children) When i go to the doctor I pay no attention to their medical advice, I always get sicker and sicker, see how doctors suck?? Circular logic is circular permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -3 points 2 years ago (2 children) You understand that doctors and media are wildly different things right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's called an analogy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -3 points 2 years ago Yeah but analogies are supposed to be at least comparable. What you’re doing is bad faith mixed with stupidity. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (3 children) When i go to the doctor I pay no attention to their medical advice, I always get sicker and sicker, see how doctors suck?? Circular logic is circular permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -3 points 2 years ago (2 children) You understand that doctors and media are wildly different things right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's called an analogy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -3 points 2 years ago Yeah but analogies are supposed to be at least comparable. What you’re doing is bad faith mixed with stupidity. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -3 points 2 years ago (2 children) You understand that doctors and media are wildly different things right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's called an analogy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -3 points 2 years ago Yeah but analogies are supposed to be at least comparable. What you’re doing is bad faith mixed with stupidity. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's called an analogy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -3 points 2 years ago Yeah but analogies are supposed to be at least comparable. What you’re doing is bad faith mixed with stupidity. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl -3 points 2 years ago Yeah but analogies are supposed to be at least comparable. What you’re doing is bad faith mixed with stupidity. permalink fedilink source parent