you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Taking over a Baltic state is feasible. NATO might react by sending helmets and prayers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Artikel 42 EU treaty. All members of the EU have to fight with their full capacity. This will escalate quickly.

    There are already EU troops in the Baltics, just to remind the Russans of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    "obligation of aid and assistance by all the means in their power". Which is far above what being in NATO requires states to do. Which just btw also covers Greenland. Only ones off the hook are Ireland and Austria due to being neutral, the treaty still covers them though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago*

    If a state decides that what’s in their power is sending 5000 helmets, then nobody will be able to force them to do more. Misinformed internet people think Article 42 is an automatic collective war switch, it is most certainly not and doubly so in the case of Greenland, lmao.

  • source
  • parent