this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
1922 points (93.1% liked)

Memes

45755 readers
1013 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
1922
2023-08-09.jpg (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You haven't explained what is objectively wrong other than you don't like it. My argument is more than just being used to it, closely matching verbal convention is useful.

Also, it's funny that you think I'm arguing either is objectively better than the other.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My argument is more than just being used to it, closely matching verbal convention is useful.

No, it's not, because even in the states you say it like three different ways and the English language is constantly changing and inherently has no rules on what order you need to say them in. The choice of which way to express the 1st of January in the English language is purely a subjective one.

And I have explained what is objectively wrong with it, it's out of order from a numerical time length standpoint.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is a lack of magnitude order objectively wrong? A date format is ultimately a language feature, and the US format successfully transmits the needed info just fine within its natural context.

It may seem objective from your perspective, but language is used in many more contexts than those you are familiar with.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because the English language has no set order to express the 1st of January.

Time lengths are objective, the way we talk about the fifth of November is not.