Whirlybird comments on Squabbles, another recent reddit alternative, seems to be taking the doomed "free speech" path

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -4 points 3 years ago (2 children)

You let people self moderate. Once you block a user you don't see them anymore.

How is that still considered “free speech” if those people’s voices will be completely missing from the platform?

It's free speech because they're allowed to post there. Them choosing not to because they can't handle other people being allowed to exercise their free speech is a them problem, not the platforms problem.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

Considering the original movement for free speech it is rather cynical to think it's freedom to silence people. But that's what people are doing when they create an environment that is so hostile towards certain groups of people that these people won't participate. Freedom to communicate hate speech is creating an echo chamber, not a free speech platform.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

The problem is when one side is calling everything they disagree with “hate speech” and banning everyone that even questions it.

Individuals blocking people isn’t “silencing” them. It’s not infringing on free speech.

It’s funny that you mention an echo chamber when this heavy handed Moderation and censorship is literally making one. When you only allow one viewpoint and ban all the others you’re literally making an echo chamber. You guys want an echo chamber, just one that echos your viewpoint.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent