you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 131 points 2 years ago (16 children)

Love the way THE BBC is trying to make signal sound like some hackers playset, really shows how much the UK gov hate encryption or people having any privacy at all.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    It also goes to show that Signal may actually be worth its salt in regards to security.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Doesn't matter if the phone is rooted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Rooted phones with signal are more secure or less secure?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Less. If someone has root privs on your phone they can screenshot without your notice and send those shots wherever they want, encryption or self-deleting messaging apps be damned.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So if Google has root privileges (does it automatically on Android? ) then they can screenshot whatever they like?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    I mean, they provide the operating system and push updates to your phone via a trusted channel, so yeah you're kinda extending them 100% trust already. I'm more thinking about malware authors here though; criminals or governments (or criminal governments) slipping shady shit onto your phone without your noticing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Important reminder. Why is this downvoted?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    Because it's largely irrelevant? If someone says "This is the best lock you can use on your front door" and someone else replies "not if you leave the key in the lock" do you think that's a important thing to mention? No lock is safe if you leave the key in the lock. Maybe it's important to remind people that you shouldn't leave your key in the lock, but that statement says nothing about the security of the lock.

    Similarly maybe it's important to remind people that their phones might already be rooted, but that statement says nothing about whether Signal is good or bad from a security point of view.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    No.

    Graham Fraser: Technology reporter.

    Signal, compared with other messaging apps, has added security features to protect the privacy of its users. Conversations on the app are end-to-end encrypted, which means they can only be read by the recipients. Signal can’t even read what has been sent. But security is only as good as the person using it.

    Link

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment