At first I was sceptical, but after a few thought, I came to the solution that, if uutils can do the same stuff, is/stays actively maintained and more secure/safe (like memory bugs), this is a good change.

What are your thoughts abouth this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 54 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The correct title should be "Ubuntu explores replacing gnu utils with MIT licenced uutils".

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    Waiting for Canonical to up sell proprietary utils features by subscription. Ubuntu's regular release cycles were brilliant in 2004 when there weren't a lot of alternatives but why does it still exist?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments