you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Yeah I went for a value of 2 on caustics because I liked the magical effect, even though it's not physically accurate. Maybe should've stuck with 1 😅

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    But you made that choice because you liked how it looked. If you're making expressive, almost surreal art and not just trying to "trick the eye" with photoreal, I think it's cool!

    The ability to break physics but maintain believability is the coolest thing about computer graphics. :D

    So, I guess it depends what you were going for, and I think the previous advice wasn't bad, but you'll always get people trying to push that realism perfection even if that's not what you're trying to do.

    Beautiful render, I really like what you did with this. :)

  • source
  • parent