Canada’s largest Muslim organisation is outraged over a bill introduced by the Quebec government that would ban headscarves for school support staff and students.

“In Quebec, we made the decision that state and the religion are separate,” said Education Minister Bernard Drainville, CBC News reported. “And today, we say the public schools are separate from religion.”

But the National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM), who are challenging in the Supreme Court the original bill that forbids religious symbols being worn by teachers, say the new bill is another infringement on their rights and unfairly targets hijab-wearing Muslims.

“This renewed attack on the fundamental rights of our community is just one of several recent actions taken by this historically unpopular government to bolster their poll numbers by attacking the rights of Muslim Canadians,” the NCCM said in a social media post.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (19 children)
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (14 children)

    They're not, the CAQ is nothing but hypocrites on the subject. They excluded Christians symbols from the get go.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [+] -16 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    They excluded religious items that didn't shove oppressive symbolism in people's faces. Get your facts straight.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    No body was enslaved due to the power of the hijab. Christian pedophiles and their obsession with the cross did use the cross as a power symbol. Interesting how racist and dumb you are

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I mean. Women in theocratic islamic states get arrested and assaulted if they don't wear their hijab. This is a pretty well documented fact.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Like Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Iran and Libya?

    Let's see, house of Saud was supported by the British as an friendly clan who then took over most of arabia and when a king acted against American/British values they got couped

    For afganistan look at operation Cyclone, most of these terror groups or their predecessors were funded by America to take out the potentially socialist leaning afganistan among many other nation which later backfired on the American govt

    Iran has a democracy under mossadeq until he nationalised oil, made Britain big made, told daddy America it's communism, mossadeq was couped with the Shah, the people then couped the Shah with the islamic fundamentalist among other funding from again America.

    Libya had ghaddafi who wasnt no saint by libya thrived under him. America invaded and now it has open slave markets

    There's a something that's similar about all these stories I can't get by hear around...

    Why is Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Jordan, Lebanon, turkey, Tunisia not killing or arresting women for hijab? That's a far far bigger amount of Muslims?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    "They only oppress women because the west were mean to them" you people are genuinely ridiculous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] -9 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That report is made by these guys.

    You, know, the guys behind Reaganomics and push for the privatization of everything

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhattan_Institute_for_Policy_Research

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Is that why the content of that article gives only absolute numbers and nothing that can actually aid comparison or put it in context?

    Feel free to treat that as a rhetorical question. 🤨

  • source
  • parent