you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 9 points 2 years ago (11 children)
  • [–] -5 points 2 years ago* (10 children)

    4.0: By agreeing to this section of the document, you accept that:

    4.0.0: You may only use Lemmy.zip if you can clearly understand and actively comply with the terms laid out on this page.

    4.0.1: You have not previously been permanently banned from the website.

    4.0.2: You are at least 18 years of age and over the regulated minimum age defined by your local law to access Lemmy.zip.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Just to make sure, @Demigodrick@lemmy.zip , would you have instance banned that user in a similar situation?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Not if they're a federated user. They're not my user to worry about. Even if they say they're not 18 it doesn't apply imo, they're not interacting directly with lemmy.zip.

    You have to agree that you're over 18 to use lemmy.zip directly as per ToS

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Not if they’re a federated user. They’re not my user to worry about. Even if they say they’re not 18 it doesn’t apply imo, they’re not interacting directly with lemmy.zip.

    4.0.2: You are at least 18 years of age and over the regulated minimum age defined by your local law to access Lemmy.zip.

    Does posting to Lemmy.zip not count as accessing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Just replied to another of your comments, but in summary no. They're not one of my users and I don't hold any data on them nor do they access lemmy.zip directly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    and I don't hold any data on them

    This here is the relevant question imo. Could the federation put relevant remote users' data onto your server? Well, not any user-specific info like the mail adress they signed up with etc. But could a judge rule some specific public post to be relevant personal data? I am not sure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -11 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Just replied to another of your comments, but in summary no. They’re not one of my users and I don’t hold any data on them nor do they access lemmy.zip directly.

    Then the ToS don't apply to anyone except your own users? Those who are signed up on your instance, I mean?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    No, anyone that isn't having a service from lemmy.zip isn't beholden to our ToS. Our CoC on the other hand we do enforce as part of the site rules when interacting with lemmy.zip communities.

  • source
  • parent