you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Looks like we have a noob that wouldn't survive 10 minutes in a kitchen lobby here. Everyone knows that cooking with steam preserves nutrients, enhances flavor, and retains the natural texture of food.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Seriously. This punk thinks he can have any form of serious power without steam. What a chump

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Well you can have solar, wind, and hydroelectric without steam, so it's not like you need steam

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I didn't say there weren't some forms of generation that didn't involve steam. I'm just saying those pathetic puny sources will never amount to the energy produced by generating steam. The sun won't always shine, and the wind won't always blow. And there's only so many places you can capture flowing water. And even the most effective forms of solar use solar thermal to make steam. We just have to admit that steam is the GOAT

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment