174
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
174 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10539 readers
200 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Personally, I think it would be better if he included more millennials and didn't have such a low cut-off.
Welcome to being old enough to be thought of as the problem, Millennials. Love, Gen X.
spoiler
asdfasdfsadfasfasdfThe problem for Gen X is the worst of us do participate.
spoiler
asdfasdfsadfasfasdfAs well as Cancun Cruz, Paul Ryan, and Rick Santorum.
Ugh
I partially agree, but I think this would be excllent at accelerating the name of younger political rising stars (where others may be hesitant or prefer experienced candidates), which by the time they reach the cutoff, would (in theory) have enough pull on their own to not require this particular PAC to fund them.
45 and under would be better. Includes all millennials.
spoiler
asdfasdfsadfasfasdfI don't see it that way. The minimum age for President in the US is 35 years of age and that's their cutoff. That, to me, doesn't make sense.
spoiler
asdfasdfsadfasfasdf