you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It reads as if fedora wanted to created a broke package. As if it was on purpose to annoy everyone. Do you think that was their intention?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago*

    The OBS and Bottles packages have been broken for a long time. Long enough that both upstream projects asked them to stop many months ago. They don't get to pretend it was a mistake. This isn't just another case of a minor packaging bug getting to users. They are packaging the software incorrectly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Not OP, but for me the issue is if you want to override the default and make it opt-out, especially sine the opt-out process isn't that well documented, then you should realize that support is a necessary part of that process and fix problems as they arise rather than resorting to name calling and hostile behavior when something you published is broken. It's a responsibility of taking on that kind of project. Either that or make it explicitly opt-in and give users a warning like with beta version opt-in notifications that the packages are not official and issues may not be fixed as quickly as the official releases.

  • source
  • parent