▲ 586 ▼ I want to know. (lemmy.ca) submitted 2 years ago by MattW03@lemmy.ca to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] fossilesque@mander.xyz 48 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago (4 children) In the biblical sense? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago I can safely say, that to know him, was to love him. And to love him, was to know him. Those who knew him, loved him, while those who did not know him, loved him from afar. permalink fedilink source parent [–] alzymologist@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) In object oriented onthology, to know is him is to be him. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago That's 2010 hippy mumbo jumbo -- to know his name in an associated-array is more than enough to know it is him permalink fedilink source parent [–] dingus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Giggity permalink fedilink source parent [–] saltesc@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Well ain't that a pickle. It all depends on your knowledge.vs.belief position when it comes to the topic of afterlife. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago (4 children) In the biblical sense? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago I can safely say, that to know him, was to love him. And to love him, was to know him. Those who knew him, loved him, while those who did not know him, loved him from afar. permalink fedilink source parent [–] alzymologist@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) In object oriented onthology, to know is him is to be him. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago That's 2010 hippy mumbo jumbo -- to know his name in an associated-array is more than enough to know it is him permalink fedilink source parent [–] dingus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Giggity permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago I can safely say, that to know him, was to love him. And to love him, was to know him. Those who knew him, loved him, while those who did not know him, loved him from afar. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] alzymologist@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) In object oriented onthology, to know is him is to be him. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago That's 2010 hippy mumbo jumbo -- to know his name in an associated-array is more than enough to know it is him permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago That's 2010 hippy mumbo jumbo -- to know his name in an associated-array is more than enough to know it is him permalink fedilink source parent
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Well ain't that a pickle. It all depends on your knowledge.vs.belief position when it comes to the topic of afterlife. permalink fedilink source parent
