Politics

10168 readers

18 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

218

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

68 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

They're against it because they know young people won't vote for old people. Why would you hamstring yourself like that?

I'm all for it because it will cause the parties to favor more youthful people. Yes, I'm an ageist when it comes to politicians and for good reasons.

1.You can't make sound decisions for the future if you won't be around to suffer the consequences of your actions.

Wisdom lacks agility. Yes, older politicians have more experience. They don't have experience in the issues we face today. In fact their knowledge and experience runs counter to solving problems we face and will face.