Another "difference between" Linux question: What ist the actual difference between them?

How fast/stable are releases, compared to each other and in comparison to upstream Arch?

I think I dont get the difference because in my understanding Arch is a rolling release and with both alternatives you want to stay as close to there releases as possible, but dont break you system frequently, right?

So whats the main differences?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 21 points 2 years ago*

There's several blogposts on the issue. If you don't mind I'll link some

https://www.hadet.dev/Manjaro-Bad/

https://github.com/arindas/manjarno

The grand deal is that you probably won't notice much issues unless you tinker a lot, but claiming to be more stable than arch while not doing much to be as such and then actually being more unstable ends up with a passionate hate crowd.

  • source
  • parent