At the current rate of horrible fiery deaths, FuelArc projects the Cybertruck will have 14.52 fatalities per 100,000 units — far eclipsing the Pinto's 0.85. (In absolute terms, FuelArc found, 27 Pinto drivers died in fires, while five Cybertruck drivers have suffered the same fate, at least so far.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 52 points 2 years ago (10 children)

And some people wonder why the cybertruck is barely sold outside the US.

Everything I hear about this thing is bad.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    It's barely sold in the US as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Might have something to do with it looking fucking stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    It's barely sold outside the US because other places (like the EU) also care about the safety of people outside the vehicle. That's why European and Asian cars (except the models explicitly for the US market like the Tacoma) are designed for pedestrians to be deflected, while US cars are a moving brick wall which will squish them like a bug.

    Also, I suspect you'd need commercial plates and a special license to drive it most other places, due to the weight.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    Do you have a reasonable alternative solution to teach pedestrians lessons?

    Edit: (/s)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    It’s only available in North America / Mexico. It won’t fly with many vehicle regulations outside of the US.

    I imagine the sharp edges are more than enough to keep it out of Europe forever. Pedestrians need to be able to roll onto a vehicle in an EU pedestrian collision. The Cybertruck will lop you in half.

  • source
  • parent