757
Amazon Says It Doesn't 'Employ' Drivers, But Records Show It Hired Firms to Prevent Them From Unionizing (www.vice.com)
submitted 3 years ago by [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world
58 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Amazon Says It Doesn't 'Employ' Drivers, But Records Show It Hired Firms to Prevent Them From Unionizing::Amazon spent $14.2 million total on anti-union consulting in 2022, filings with the Department of Labor show.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -14 points 3 years ago (16 children)

Do you want to pay people more because they're better at their job or do you want to pay people more because they've been warming a chair longer than anyone else?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
    •
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    I really don't care to play "who deserves a minimum quality of life".

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [+] -12 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Reality doesn't care whether you care to play or not.

    There's a limited amount of resources, you can't hire everyone on Earth, you can't give everyone an unlimited salary. Everything past that you're making decisions as to who gets what.

    And by the way, if you make enough poor decisions eventually everyone loses their jobs.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Agreed, there’s limited resources, that’s exactly why we can’t afford to waste any more on another CEO mega yacht or private plane. We’re capable of a post-scarcity society with just the setup we have today, were we to distribute resources on need rather than greed.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    Or because people need more to make a living? The whole argument of "it's a shitty job and shouldn't be used to support you" doesn't really work anymore.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [+] -6 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    That doesn't have anything to do with what I said.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [+] 2 points 3 years ago (7 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [+] -7 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Its a very true dichotomy.

    Hey let's hire Ashok for this position! He's really good!

    Oops, sorry. Bob Whiteman has been here for 30 years. He's just good enough not to fire but he has seniority so he gets first dibs on the job.

    Hey, let's give Ashok a raise! He's really good!

    Oops, sorry. Bob Whiteman has been here for 30 years. He's just good enough not to fire. It he's been here the longest so he gets paid the most.

    The false dichotomy is assuming your choices are a massive adversarial bureaucracy or not making a living wage.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    "It's a very true dichotomy!"

    Proceeds to make up an imagined scenario with a ridiculous fake name to prove it's reality.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Found the guy who never worked a union job.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Found the guy with the superiority complex mad that the union didn’t fall for their sucking up to the bosses.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •