Here's a fun one: tell a conservative that rich people are doomed to go to hell. If they ask how you figure that, quote:

It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God

Without fail their programming will kick in and you will get some lengthy blog post with stupid reasoning about how what Jesus was actually talking about was some rock formation and some other dumb shit. Meanwhile you can just read the verses before and after for context and it's pretty damn clear what was meant: greed is a form of evil.

This is the difference between reading the Bible and having it explained to you.

Another fun one: tell them God prefers atheists to vague believers. Prepare for another programmed blog post about how Jesus was actually referring to the taste of the water at some town that completely ignores the context of the book itself.

The point is that whatever verses are picked out agrees with what the pulpit wants to believe. It makes their hate righteous.

I don't know about other churches, but the Methodist Church I used to go to with my grandma never had a pastor out of the 2 I witnessed that did stuff like that. Maybe it depends on the region, but I've never heard of those type of manipulative strategies where I live, so I'd say I'm pretty lucky on that front. Closest I've probably heard of something like that in my area are the Mormons, but that's a whole nother can of worms that I don't wanna touch.

Regardless, that doesn't sound right or like a very Christian thing to do. Even if the verses tell of similar things, context for those verses are real important, just like with any other readings (religious or otherwise).