▲ 1702 ▼ Why you shouldn't use Brave Browser (www.spacebar.news) submitted 3 years ago by dantheclamman@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 846 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] sirico@feddit.uk 14 points 3 years ago (10 children) Which features I've never had an issue permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] vettnerk@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 years ago Same. I use furefox for everything* at work, despite everything being heavily integrated with teams, sharepoint, et.al. *: The only thing that doesn't work with firefox is this inhouse web service that hasn't been updated since 2017. It's about to be replaced anyway, so nobody bothered to fix/update it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] rambaroo@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago The custom background effects don't work on Firefox permalink fedilink source parent [–] xavier666@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago (7 children) Simple one-to-one calling is disabled saying it's only available on Chrome. I'm pretty sure it's recent since I had calls a few months back on Firefox. I'm also sure that it's not some group policy since I'm on Ubuntu without any sort of ActiveDirectory so it's a pure browser issue. Also, they force the old UI in Firefox due to some reason. Typical BS from Microsoft. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (6 children) Does changing user agent mitigate some of those issues? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago (2 children) In a just world, the fact of changing the user agent fixing the issues would make for a slam-dunk anti-trust case. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago It really should, no doubt, but this is not a perfect world permalink fedilink source parent [–] xavier666@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago If you confront Microsoft with this, then they will say they don't have enough resources to test "thousands" of browsers which is why they have restricted their efforts to Chromium only, while making billions of dollars in profits each year. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Knusper@feddit.de 3 points 3 years ago (2 children) I've tried it today and yeah, 1-to-1 calls magically/unsurprisingly start working. In fact, the whole UI gets a facelift and lots of new features. If I had to guess, I'd say Microsoft keeps around a version of their UI, which hasn't been maintained in over a year, and serves that to anyone initiating communication with a user-agent string they don't like. If that's true, that's a massive security vulnerability. Admittedly, also unsurprising for Microsoft. @xavier666@lemm.ee permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Wow, that's egregious on so many levels! This kind of browser apartheid should be illegal permalink fedilink source parent [–] xavier666@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* Thanks a lot for this...time to get an extension. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vettnerk@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 years ago Same. I use furefox for everything* at work, despite everything being heavily integrated with teams, sharepoint, et.al. *: The only thing that doesn't work with firefox is this inhouse web service that hasn't been updated since 2017. It's about to be replaced anyway, so nobody bothered to fix/update it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rambaroo@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago The custom background effects don't work on Firefox permalink fedilink source parent
[–] xavier666@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago (7 children) Simple one-to-one calling is disabled saying it's only available on Chrome. I'm pretty sure it's recent since I had calls a few months back on Firefox. I'm also sure that it's not some group policy since I'm on Ubuntu without any sort of ActiveDirectory so it's a pure browser issue. Also, they force the old UI in Firefox due to some reason. Typical BS from Microsoft. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (6 children) Does changing user agent mitigate some of those issues? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago (2 children) In a just world, the fact of changing the user agent fixing the issues would make for a slam-dunk anti-trust case. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago It really should, no doubt, but this is not a perfect world permalink fedilink source parent [–] xavier666@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago If you confront Microsoft with this, then they will say they don't have enough resources to test "thousands" of browsers which is why they have restricted their efforts to Chromium only, while making billions of dollars in profits each year. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Knusper@feddit.de 3 points 3 years ago (2 children) I've tried it today and yeah, 1-to-1 calls magically/unsurprisingly start working. In fact, the whole UI gets a facelift and lots of new features. If I had to guess, I'd say Microsoft keeps around a version of their UI, which hasn't been maintained in over a year, and serves that to anyone initiating communication with a user-agent string they don't like. If that's true, that's a massive security vulnerability. Admittedly, also unsurprising for Microsoft. @xavier666@lemm.ee permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Wow, that's egregious on so many levels! This kind of browser apartheid should be illegal permalink fedilink source parent [–] xavier666@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* Thanks a lot for this...time to get an extension. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (6 children) Does changing user agent mitigate some of those issues? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago (2 children) In a just world, the fact of changing the user agent fixing the issues would make for a slam-dunk anti-trust case. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago It really should, no doubt, but this is not a perfect world permalink fedilink source parent [–] xavier666@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago If you confront Microsoft with this, then they will say they don't have enough resources to test "thousands" of browsers which is why they have restricted their efforts to Chromium only, while making billions of dollars in profits each year. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Knusper@feddit.de 3 points 3 years ago (2 children) I've tried it today and yeah, 1-to-1 calls magically/unsurprisingly start working. In fact, the whole UI gets a facelift and lots of new features. If I had to guess, I'd say Microsoft keeps around a version of their UI, which hasn't been maintained in over a year, and serves that to anyone initiating communication with a user-agent string they don't like. If that's true, that's a massive security vulnerability. Admittedly, also unsurprising for Microsoft. @xavier666@lemm.ee permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Wow, that's egregious on so many levels! This kind of browser apartheid should be illegal permalink fedilink source parent [–] xavier666@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* Thanks a lot for this...time to get an extension. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago (2 children) In a just world, the fact of changing the user agent fixing the issues would make for a slam-dunk anti-trust case. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago It really should, no doubt, but this is not a perfect world permalink fedilink source parent [–] xavier666@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago If you confront Microsoft with this, then they will say they don't have enough resources to test "thousands" of browsers which is why they have restricted their efforts to Chromium only, while making billions of dollars in profits each year. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago It really should, no doubt, but this is not a perfect world permalink fedilink source parent
[–] xavier666@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago If you confront Microsoft with this, then they will say they don't have enough resources to test "thousands" of browsers which is why they have restricted their efforts to Chromium only, while making billions of dollars in profits each year. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Knusper@feddit.de 3 points 3 years ago (2 children) I've tried it today and yeah, 1-to-1 calls magically/unsurprisingly start working. In fact, the whole UI gets a facelift and lots of new features. If I had to guess, I'd say Microsoft keeps around a version of their UI, which hasn't been maintained in over a year, and serves that to anyone initiating communication with a user-agent string they don't like. If that's true, that's a massive security vulnerability. Admittedly, also unsurprising for Microsoft. @xavier666@lemm.ee permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Wow, that's egregious on so many levels! This kind of browser apartheid should be illegal permalink fedilink source parent [–] xavier666@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* Thanks a lot for this...time to get an extension. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Wow, that's egregious on so many levels! This kind of browser apartheid should be illegal permalink fedilink source parent
[–] xavier666@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* Thanks a lot for this...time to get an extension. permalink fedilink source parent