you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

it's not even true information, the new tech stack is zero trust

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Zero trust means there’s no trust assumed on the protocol - I.e. it distrusts all actors and the protocol takes steps to work in that trustless environment. I don’t know how that applies specifically to matrix.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    So the guy above the guy avobe me was supposedly wrong?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Like I said, I don’t know the inner workings of Matrix. But according to the second guy that isn’t you, Matrix has a new tech stack that is zero trust. Now, there are many ways in which that can be true and I don’t know if what Matrix has right now can indeed be considered dissident-level privacy.

    It’s good enough for my threat level (I basically just use it for software support). If I were planning to overthrow a regime, I’d likely go with SimpleX or some other privacy-first messengers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    the new cryptographic protocol protects metadata, like signal. the servers know nothing about any encrypted chats

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments