▲ 1525 ▼ "Works for me" (lemmy.sdf.org) submitted 2 years ago by xia@lemmy.sdf.org to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev 83 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] NekoKamiGuru@ttrpg.network 20 points 2 years ago (1 child) This has been a problem for a very very long time permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] luciole@beehaw.org 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) I agree with you that failing to support multiple browsers is an old problem, but I think the cause has shifted. Back in the last century, supporting both browsers amounted to sniffing the browser and implementing the same feature twice. document.layers vs document.all for example. Nowadays I think the problem is different: we just don't know what's going on. The site is transpiled from TypeScript, written on top of React or Vue which drastically switches paradigm (bonus for Tailwind), packed with building tools, and the average dev has little understanding of what actually comes out. It's a tall stack of leaky abstractions on top of the already tall one of the web. The dev is pretty sure it works on Chrome so they say it does work there, but it was not even a deliberate choice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 6 points 2 years ago For most sites it’s a testing matrix issue. Most testing teams look at browser stats and choose how to apply their limited resources based on that. So the dev probably doesn’t even see the bug that exists for an old Firefox version as there’s no testing done on it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] luciole@beehaw.org 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) I agree with you that failing to support multiple browsers is an old problem, but I think the cause has shifted. Back in the last century, supporting both browsers amounted to sniffing the browser and implementing the same feature twice. document.layers vs document.all for example. Nowadays I think the problem is different: we just don't know what's going on. The site is transpiled from TypeScript, written on top of React or Vue which drastically switches paradigm (bonus for Tailwind), packed with building tools, and the average dev has little understanding of what actually comes out. It's a tall stack of leaky abstractions on top of the already tall one of the web. The dev is pretty sure it works on Chrome so they say it does work there, but it was not even a deliberate choice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 6 points 2 years ago For most sites it’s a testing matrix issue. Most testing teams look at browser stats and choose how to apply their limited resources based on that. So the dev probably doesn’t even see the bug that exists for an old Firefox version as there’s no testing done on it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 6 points 2 years ago For most sites it’s a testing matrix issue. Most testing teams look at browser stats and choose how to apply their limited resources based on that. So the dev probably doesn’t even see the bug that exists for an old Firefox version as there’s no testing done on it. permalink fedilink source parent