▲ 664 ▼ Frustrated YouTube viewers seek explanation for hour-long unskippable ads (Update: Statement) (www.androidauthority.com) submitted 2 years ago by moe90@feddit.nl to c/technology@lemmy.world 225 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (13 children) Arms races are rarely won by anyone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (8 children) They are won by arms dealers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 2 years ago (5 children) In this case though the arms dealers make the arms for free so I'm kind of okay with it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (3 children) And all of it could have been avoided if google just audited/policed the ads it served. No sane person minds watching a 5-10 second add every 10-20 minutes to support the platform. But rather than spend money expanding their ad department to audit and police the adds, they are spending gobs and gobs of money trying to force people to see view virus-delivering ads, racist ads, blatant misinformation, etc. No one wants to be forced to spend 30 minutes watching a pragerU video on how the black man should be grateful for slavery and all the "good" its brought him But that seems to be the world that google wants. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] OR3X@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Klear@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago No sane person minds watching a 5-10 second add every 10-20 minutes to support the platform. Fuck that. Ads are cancer. Willing consuming cancer is insanity. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago If they limited the ad time in videos, ad time would be worth more. permalink fedilink source parent [–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago There are arms dealers on both sides. Anti-adblockers also require development, and I doubt anyone does that for free. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago That's an excellent Maxim. permalink fedilink source parent [–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago True. permalink fedilink source parent [–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (3 children) This is a war that was fought by broadcast TV and the makers of videotapes, DVDs, and blu-rays. In every case the Corpos failed. So no, this arms race is and will be won by the ad blockers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Except all of those formats are now obsolete, no major company is even making Blu-Ray players anymore, and people have moved on to others. So did they fail or did they just find a different method? I'd say the latter. How many people do you know with a working VCR at this point? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) no major company is even making Blu-Ray players anymore Uh, yes they are. What are you smoking? They even still make DVD's and straight DVD players. They even still make VCR's. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Pardon me, you're correct. Sony and Panasonic are the last two holdouts. https://www.cnet.com/tech/home-entertainment/lg-one-of-the-last-holdouts-ceases-production-of-blu-ray-players/ Also, those are not VCRs still being manufactured, that's selling off stock. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (8 children) They are won by arms dealers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 2 years ago (5 children) In this case though the arms dealers make the arms for free so I'm kind of okay with it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (3 children) And all of it could have been avoided if google just audited/policed the ads it served. No sane person minds watching a 5-10 second add every 10-20 minutes to support the platform. But rather than spend money expanding their ad department to audit and police the adds, they are spending gobs and gobs of money trying to force people to see view virus-delivering ads, racist ads, blatant misinformation, etc. No one wants to be forced to spend 30 minutes watching a pragerU video on how the black man should be grateful for slavery and all the "good" its brought him But that seems to be the world that google wants. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] OR3X@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Klear@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago No sane person minds watching a 5-10 second add every 10-20 minutes to support the platform. Fuck that. Ads are cancer. Willing consuming cancer is insanity. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago If they limited the ad time in videos, ad time would be worth more. permalink fedilink source parent [–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago There are arms dealers on both sides. Anti-adblockers also require development, and I doubt anyone does that for free. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago That's an excellent Maxim. permalink fedilink source parent [–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago True. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 2 years ago (5 children) In this case though the arms dealers make the arms for free so I'm kind of okay with it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (3 children) And all of it could have been avoided if google just audited/policed the ads it served. No sane person minds watching a 5-10 second add every 10-20 minutes to support the platform. But rather than spend money expanding their ad department to audit and police the adds, they are spending gobs and gobs of money trying to force people to see view virus-delivering ads, racist ads, blatant misinformation, etc. No one wants to be forced to spend 30 minutes watching a pragerU video on how the black man should be grateful for slavery and all the "good" its brought him But that seems to be the world that google wants. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] OR3X@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Klear@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago No sane person minds watching a 5-10 second add every 10-20 minutes to support the platform. Fuck that. Ads are cancer. Willing consuming cancer is insanity. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago If they limited the ad time in videos, ad time would be worth more. permalink fedilink source parent [–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago There are arms dealers on both sides. Anti-adblockers also require development, and I doubt anyone does that for free. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (3 children) And all of it could have been avoided if google just audited/policed the ads it served. No sane person minds watching a 5-10 second add every 10-20 minutes to support the platform. But rather than spend money expanding their ad department to audit and police the adds, they are spending gobs and gobs of money trying to force people to see view virus-delivering ads, racist ads, blatant misinformation, etc. No one wants to be forced to spend 30 minutes watching a pragerU video on how the black man should be grateful for slavery and all the "good" its brought him But that seems to be the world that google wants. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] OR3X@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Klear@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago No sane person minds watching a 5-10 second add every 10-20 minutes to support the platform. Fuck that. Ads are cancer. Willing consuming cancer is insanity. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago If they limited the ad time in videos, ad time would be worth more. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] OR3X@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Klear@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago No sane person minds watching a 5-10 second add every 10-20 minutes to support the platform. Fuck that. Ads are cancer. Willing consuming cancer is insanity. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago If they limited the ad time in videos, ad time would be worth more. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago There are arms dealers on both sides. Anti-adblockers also require development, and I doubt anyone does that for free. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago That's an excellent Maxim. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (3 children) This is a war that was fought by broadcast TV and the makers of videotapes, DVDs, and blu-rays. In every case the Corpos failed. So no, this arms race is and will be won by the ad blockers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Except all of those formats are now obsolete, no major company is even making Blu-Ray players anymore, and people have moved on to others. So did they fail or did they just find a different method? I'd say the latter. How many people do you know with a working VCR at this point? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) no major company is even making Blu-Ray players anymore Uh, yes they are. What are you smoking? They even still make DVD's and straight DVD players. They even still make VCR's. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Pardon me, you're correct. Sony and Panasonic are the last two holdouts. https://www.cnet.com/tech/home-entertainment/lg-one-of-the-last-holdouts-ceases-production-of-blu-ray-players/ Also, those are not VCRs still being manufactured, that's selling off stock. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Except all of those formats are now obsolete, no major company is even making Blu-Ray players anymore, and people have moved on to others. So did they fail or did they just find a different method? I'd say the latter. How many people do you know with a working VCR at this point? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) no major company is even making Blu-Ray players anymore Uh, yes they are. What are you smoking? They even still make DVD's and straight DVD players. They even still make VCR's. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Pardon me, you're correct. Sony and Panasonic are the last two holdouts. https://www.cnet.com/tech/home-entertainment/lg-one-of-the-last-holdouts-ceases-production-of-blu-ray-players/ Also, those are not VCRs still being manufactured, that's selling off stock. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) no major company is even making Blu-Ray players anymore Uh, yes they are. What are you smoking? They even still make DVD's and straight DVD players. They even still make VCR's. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Pardon me, you're correct. Sony and Panasonic are the last two holdouts. https://www.cnet.com/tech/home-entertainment/lg-one-of-the-last-holdouts-ceases-production-of-blu-ray-players/ Also, those are not VCRs still being manufactured, that's selling off stock. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Pardon me, you're correct. Sony and Panasonic are the last two holdouts. https://www.cnet.com/tech/home-entertainment/lg-one-of-the-last-holdouts-ceases-production-of-blu-ray-players/ Also, those are not VCRs still being manufactured, that's selling off stock. permalink fedilink source parent