It honestly depends on the person asking. There are people who aren't complete morons where a call is a valid way to quickly solve a problem or exchange info.

But I sent a guy an email asking a simple multiple choice question, he messages "quick call?", calls, shares his screen, shows me my own email with his written response in reply, and reads it to me.

Messages are nearly always better IMO because they don't demand my immediate and undivided attention, the exception being an emergency or similar, which would warrant that.

A phone call means I have to stop whatever I'm currently doing, at a potentially inconvenient time, to deal with it whilst also having no idea how long the call will be. Messages can be dealt with whenever you're actually free to deal with them.

Plus when you're dealing with companies or the government, phone calls don't give you a record of what was discussed, messages/emails do

I'm neurodivergent and messages are significantly more accessible to me, especially in a work context.

I struggle to take in audio information, so if it's important then messages are much better because I can refer back to them. If it's not important, it's not worth the interruption because messages also don't take me out of my workflow because it's asynchronous so I can read and respond when I've got a moment. A 5 minute unscheduled call is significantly more disruptive to me than an hour long scheduled meeting.

No matter how many times I tell my boss all of this, I get at least one unscheduled no context "do you have a minute to chat?" every single day and it's effect on my productivity is very problematic.

But the person on the other side also has shit to do and taking a call may disrupt their work.

There's no silver bullet. In some situations one thing might be better for both, while in others, not so much.

but isn't typing more efficient? I can read and type faster than I can speak for sure