723
Google decides it won't comply with EU fact-checking law (www.engadget.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
237 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Feel like that speech would have meant more when he still had the power to do anything about it. Instead of going to war against this oligarchy he chose to cash his political capital on a rushed pull out of Afghanistan, and to kill a bunch of Palestinians.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

    Instead of going to war against this oligarchy he chose to cash his political capital on a rushed pull out of Afghanistan

    I don't see how this is laid on Biden since Trump agreed to the withdrawal and timeline, and then R relentlessly hammered Biden for not getting on it, then relentlessly hammered him for the problems related to rushing it.

    I agree with the rest of your comment.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    don't see how this is laid on Biden since Trump agreed to the withdrawal and timeline

    Trump made the original withdrawal date and Biden arbitrarily stuck to it when he came into office.

    He was under no real obligation to stick to the timeline and it was a betrayal to every Afghan citizen that worked with us. I don't really care what Republicans bitch and moan about.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Fair opinion I guess, but I think there are plenty of things you can cleanly give Biden shit about before you get all the way down to complying with the troop withdrawal schedule that Trump committed us to.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Eh, I guess it's a matter of opinion. To me knowingly finishing your opponents mistake is worse than making an honest one yourself.

    I may be a little biased though, as I have had the opportunity to provide healthcare to a few of the Afghan interpreters that were lucky enough to evacuate and make it state side.

    I work in orthopedics and rehabilitation, so they had all been pretty banged up, missing limbs, or had lower limbs injuries that affected their mobility. But their personal injuries were nothing compared to how much uncertainty they faced about not knowing about the well being of extended family and friends still in Afghanistan, a home they will likely never have the chance to ever visit again.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    All fair points, but what do you suppose the Taliban would have done to those same people and more if the US had not pulled out when Trump told them we would?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    what do you suppose the Taliban would have done to those same people and more if the US had not pulled out when Trump told them we would?

    I don't really think slowing down a pull out a few weeks or even months would really upset the Taliban anymore than what we had already done, I mean we've been there for more than a decade.

    The point would be that it would have given more time for people to make their way to the airbase, and for more than just a couple airplanes full of people evacuate.

    The only reason the Taliban was able to capture Kabul so quickly is because they and the security forces knew that the US wasn't providing any air cover.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    I chose to see this as a glass half full situation. I hope that in four years we see this speech as a starting point in which the Dems run on a platform of economic populism.

    You may call me overly optimistic. However, the reason I am even remotely hopeful is that the very rich (and the media they own) are fully realigning with the GOP. This means Democrats will receive far less large donations in the future, and things will get shaken up, whether leadership likes it or not.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent