Immutable Distro Opinions (www.linuxfordevices.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/linux@lemmy.ml
 

I recently took up Bazzite from mint and I love it! After using it for a few days I found out it was an immutable distro, after looking into what that is I thought it was a great idea. I love the idea of getting a fresh image for every update, I think for businesses/ less tech savvy people it adds another layer of protection from self harm because you can't mess with the root without extra steps.

For anyone who isn't familiar with immutable distros I attached a picture of mutable vs immutable, I don't want to describe it because I am still learning.

My question is: what does the community think of it?

Do the downsides outweigh the benefits or vice versa?

Could this help Linux reach more mainstream audiences?

Any other input would be appreciated!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I remain interested in the immutables or atomic distros because I know a lot of smart people that swear by them.

I also don't try them just yet because I know a lot of dumb people like me that end up breaking a lot of stuff before quitting them altogether.

They could be amazing and just not perfected yet or they may be a meme and no one's proved it outright just yet. Will be lurking this thread either way lool :D

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yeah I think atomic is more appropriate but I'm not exactly sure what the difference is?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Immutable = Read-Only Root FS && Updates entire system image rather than individual files
    Atomic = Updates as single transaction (all or no update) && Containerization w/ Rollback capability

    This is quick summary from quick research pls correct where technically wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If we're asking what people mean when they use those descriptors, then you're correct.

    However, literally speaking, in this context, immutable only means read-only, and atomic only means that updates are applied all-at-once or not at all (no weird in-between state if your update crashes halfway through).

    The rest of the features (rollbacks, containerization, and immutable meaning full system image updates) are typically implied, but not explicitly part of the definition.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 years ago

    That makes sense, bazzite is referred to as atomic (that's what I meant in the above comment about atomic being more appropriate, forgot to add that context though lol) specifically instead of immutable. Bazzite updates like you said and you can always roll back, thank you for the explanation!

  • source
  • parent