you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 53 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (11 children)
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Yeah, while I don't doubt Rogan would swallow it hook, line and sinker; just nodding along is what most people would do with someone that's a guest but batshit crazy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I'd also say that JRE is entertaining, not education. I don't listen to it myself, never have and probably never will, but I can see why people do.

    I listen to a true crime pod which incorporates actual audio from police/court hearings and it can be great fun to listen to someone absolutely unhinged try to explain why they're innocent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    I know it's dangerous, but it's important to at least tell them people ignoring them aren't silently agreeing with their bullshit. So, if you think you can manage the risk, you should tell them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    He can later edit that part tho

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    ?-? I just said that instead of showing himself nodding to the crazy man he could instead edit out that part.

    Not sure where you get I'm "defending" anybody, when I'm saying that he had the option, the journalistic duty and every chance to not showing himself agreeing with Gibson's rants.

    I suggest you a camomile, avoiding social networks for a day and a walk in a forest or similar natural environment.

  • source
  • parent