you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 24 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I think anyone is welcome to try this, but the core ethos of the web is backwards compatibility. To my unending irritation, even non-standard behaviors/APIs like WebUSB have become critical for sites to function.

The last time we actually dropped a feature, it was Flash, and that took a decade and there is still tons of effectively dead/permanently lost content because of it.

Creating a browser that only implements a subset of the standards is fine for very niche usecases but I don't expect it to ever overtake the major browsers. We'll see how Ladybird fares as it's compatibility increases.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    I’d rather drop some of the more modern features like WebGL, WASM, and AI. A lot of this crap needs to be plugins instead of built into the browser.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    Flash wasn't a web feature, it was a proprietary software that was filling a need that wasn't met by the actual web standards.

    Flash wasn't dropped, Flash died when it wasn't needed anymore (thanks to HTML5).

  • source
  • parent