you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 29 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Would you think that maybe the feature set implemented by modern web browsers has grown too large? Perhaps we need to start dropping some features to keep the web browser design lean.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I think anyone is welcome to try this, but the core ethos of the web is backwards compatibility. To my unending irritation, even non-standard behaviors/APIs like WebUSB have become critical for sites to function.

    The last time we actually dropped a feature, it was Flash, and that took a decade and there is still tons of effectively dead/permanently lost content because of it.

    Creating a browser that only implements a subset of the standards is fine for very niche usecases but I don't expect it to ever overtake the major browsers. We'll see how Ladybird fares as it's compatibility increases.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    I’d rather drop some of the more modern features like WebGL, WASM, and AI. A lot of this crap needs to be plugins instead of built into the browser.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    Flash wasn't a web feature, it was a proprietary software that was filling a need that wasn't met by the actual web standards.

    Flash wasn't dropped, Flash died when it wasn't needed anymore (thanks to HTML5).

  • source
  • parent