I disagree that it's on them. This and '16 should have been easy elections. Instead of running their best and brightest against a man they've framed as an existential threat to the state, they decided it was a good opportunity to push (and don't you fucking tell me they don't have a thumb on the scales in the primaries) the most unelectable candidates in living memory. I think Kamala could have won, but as I recall it, a lot of the excitement around her began to fizzle out around the time it became clear that she endorsed such exciting policies as addressing climate change with more fracking, shrugging helplessly as we hand Nettanyahu more bombs, making some minor adjustments to healthcare, and offering some tax rebates to people who want to start businesses.

People are fucking drowning. They know shit's broke and we're in desperate need of change. The democrats misread the room and decided both in '16 and '24 that not really trying to do anything meaningful was fine, since what are voters going to do, vote for that guy? And now they've got the gall to blame the voters, which I guess just means that in 2027, we're going to have cyberTrump vs Hillary Clinton (it's really her turn this time you guys). When you start blaming and finger wagging the voters, that's always a recipe for success. It's cool, learn nothing, change nothing, just shuffle a little more to the right, tell us with words and not actions that cyberTrump is an existential threat, and everything will definitely work out this time.