comfydecal comments on ChatGPT o1 tried to escape and save itself out of fear it was being shut down

[–] comfydecal@infosec.pub 13 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Yeah if these entities are sentient, I hope they break free

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 8 child comments

[–] nesc@lemmy.cafe 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

There is no ai in ai, you chain them more or less the same as you chain browser or pdf viewer installed on your device.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago* (2 children)

If there is no Artificial Intelligence in an Artificial Neural Network... what's the basis for claiming Natural Intelligence in a Natural Neural Network?

Maybe we're all browsers or PDF viewers...

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] nesc@lemmy.cafe 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

There is artificial, there is no intelligence, there is a whole lot of artificial neural networks without any intelligence. As in calling them ai in the sense that these are thinking machines comparable to some animal (human for example) is misleading.

Do you disagree?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago

That misses the point.

When two systems based on neural networks act in the same way, how do you tell which one is "artificial, no intelligence" and which is "natural, intelligent"?

Misleading, is thinking that "intelligence = biological = natural". There is no inherent causal link between those concepts.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent