277

Japan Decides That Copyright Doesn't Apply to AI Training (technomancers.ai)

submitted 2 years ago by michael@lemmy.perthchat.org to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

72 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] CloverSi@lemmy.comfysnug.space 8 points 2 years ago

This was my thinking too. In principle I support restrictions on the data AI can be trained on, no question - but practically speaking the only difference restricting it makes is giving whatever companies gobble up the most IP the sole ability to make legal AI art. If a decision like that was made, there would be no more stable diffusion, available to anyone and everyone for free; the only legal options would be e.g. Adobe Firefly.

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023

277 points (78.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

69678 readers

2235 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.