▲ 974 ▼ None. Suffer. (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by Stamets@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works 159 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (9 children) I've heard of using them as parts of like contracts? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago (7 children) What does blockchain solve that existing contracts don’t do? Blockchain has takeover possibility permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (6 children) Honestly I don't know. I'm just pointing out the only thing that kind of sort of sounded like a good idea for it I've ever heard. For pictures it's stupid that's for sure permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago (5 children) It’s not a picture though. It’s a link to a picture on a server somewhere. If the host goes down, you own nothing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The technology behind it can be used for things other than pictures. That's kind of the point people are making permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago Right, and my original question was what does the technology solve? And so far the answer appears to be nothing permalink fedilink source parent [–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Isn't it just a small amount of data? If the picture is small enough you could put it directly on the blockchain. Dunno why you would though. It's very limiting for no particular gain. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ConnecticutKen@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) But in NFTs the picture is not on the Blockchain. Only a link to the picture is on the Blockchain and the picture itself is still just on the web. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago No, they are right. What they are saying is that even though pretty much all NFTs contain a link to a picture on the blockchain, theoretically you could write a really, really small image in the space where you would normally write the URL. From a quick google, that’s 100 bytes. For a black and white image, that’s 100 pixels. For color, that’s around 30 pixels permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sc00ter@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Yea the idea there is that with it being decentralized, it has an unedited history. So if each block added to the chain is a new transaction, you can see previous agreements. Being decentralized also means that it's public record and everyone can see the contract/agreement/transaction. There's a lot of neat stuff that can be done, but as the other guy stated, it's a solution looking for a problem. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago (7 children) What does blockchain solve that existing contracts don’t do? Blockchain has takeover possibility permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (6 children) Honestly I don't know. I'm just pointing out the only thing that kind of sort of sounded like a good idea for it I've ever heard. For pictures it's stupid that's for sure permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago (5 children) It’s not a picture though. It’s a link to a picture on a server somewhere. If the host goes down, you own nothing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The technology behind it can be used for things other than pictures. That's kind of the point people are making permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago Right, and my original question was what does the technology solve? And so far the answer appears to be nothing permalink fedilink source parent [–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Isn't it just a small amount of data? If the picture is small enough you could put it directly on the blockchain. Dunno why you would though. It's very limiting for no particular gain. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ConnecticutKen@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) But in NFTs the picture is not on the Blockchain. Only a link to the picture is on the Blockchain and the picture itself is still just on the web. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago No, they are right. What they are saying is that even though pretty much all NFTs contain a link to a picture on the blockchain, theoretically you could write a really, really small image in the space where you would normally write the URL. From a quick google, that’s 100 bytes. For a black and white image, that’s 100 pixels. For color, that’s around 30 pixels permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (6 children) Honestly I don't know. I'm just pointing out the only thing that kind of sort of sounded like a good idea for it I've ever heard. For pictures it's stupid that's for sure permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago (5 children) It’s not a picture though. It’s a link to a picture on a server somewhere. If the host goes down, you own nothing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The technology behind it can be used for things other than pictures. That's kind of the point people are making permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago Right, and my original question was what does the technology solve? And so far the answer appears to be nothing permalink fedilink source parent [–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Isn't it just a small amount of data? If the picture is small enough you could put it directly on the blockchain. Dunno why you would though. It's very limiting for no particular gain. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ConnecticutKen@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) But in NFTs the picture is not on the Blockchain. Only a link to the picture is on the Blockchain and the picture itself is still just on the web. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago No, they are right. What they are saying is that even though pretty much all NFTs contain a link to a picture on the blockchain, theoretically you could write a really, really small image in the space where you would normally write the URL. From a quick google, that’s 100 bytes. For a black and white image, that’s 100 pixels. For color, that’s around 30 pixels permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago (5 children) It’s not a picture though. It’s a link to a picture on a server somewhere. If the host goes down, you own nothing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The technology behind it can be used for things other than pictures. That's kind of the point people are making permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago Right, and my original question was what does the technology solve? And so far the answer appears to be nothing permalink fedilink source parent [–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Isn't it just a small amount of data? If the picture is small enough you could put it directly on the blockchain. Dunno why you would though. It's very limiting for no particular gain. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ConnecticutKen@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) But in NFTs the picture is not on the Blockchain. Only a link to the picture is on the Blockchain and the picture itself is still just on the web. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago No, they are right. What they are saying is that even though pretty much all NFTs contain a link to a picture on the blockchain, theoretically you could write a really, really small image in the space where you would normally write the URL. From a quick google, that’s 100 bytes. For a black and white image, that’s 100 pixels. For color, that’s around 30 pixels permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The technology behind it can be used for things other than pictures. That's kind of the point people are making permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago Right, and my original question was what does the technology solve? And so far the answer appears to be nothing permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago Right, and my original question was what does the technology solve? And so far the answer appears to be nothing permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Isn't it just a small amount of data? If the picture is small enough you could put it directly on the blockchain. Dunno why you would though. It's very limiting for no particular gain. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ConnecticutKen@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) But in NFTs the picture is not on the Blockchain. Only a link to the picture is on the Blockchain and the picture itself is still just on the web. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago No, they are right. What they are saying is that even though pretty much all NFTs contain a link to a picture on the blockchain, theoretically you could write a really, really small image in the space where you would normally write the URL. From a quick google, that’s 100 bytes. For a black and white image, that’s 100 pixels. For color, that’s around 30 pixels permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ConnecticutKen@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) But in NFTs the picture is not on the Blockchain. Only a link to the picture is on the Blockchain and the picture itself is still just on the web. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago No, they are right. What they are saying is that even though pretty much all NFTs contain a link to a picture on the blockchain, theoretically you could write a really, really small image in the space where you would normally write the URL. From a quick google, that’s 100 bytes. For a black and white image, that’s 100 pixels. For color, that’s around 30 pixels permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago No, they are right. What they are saying is that even though pretty much all NFTs contain a link to a picture on the blockchain, theoretically you could write a really, really small image in the space where you would normally write the URL. From a quick google, that’s 100 bytes. For a black and white image, that’s 100 pixels. For color, that’s around 30 pixels permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sc00ter@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago Yea the idea there is that with it being decentralized, it has an unedited history. So if each block added to the chain is a new transaction, you can see previous agreements. Being decentralized also means that it's public record and everyone can see the contract/agreement/transaction. There's a lot of neat stuff that can be done, but as the other guy stated, it's a solution looking for a problem. permalink fedilink source parent