▲ 518 ▼ Optimisation is a Slow Process (mander.xyz) submitted 2 years ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (6 children) That's what they theorize. How do you prove it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago (5 children) Science shit? I dont know....but I wouldn't say that's a good reason to doubt it, for example I don't know how they proved black holes exist but they seem pretty confident. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (4 children) Ok, if it's just particles how does it distinguish the particles on a molecular level. This is important shit. The closest science can do is gas chromatography and that's an instrument which exists in any reputable lab. Also, using gas chromatography for this a far cry from the simple function of our sense of smell which can distinguish scents just by simply introducing a fragrence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe I'm misreading your tone, but I'm not trying to argue with you - I'm genuinely curious about this and if you have superior knowledge I'm open! My understanding from a quick skim of Wikipedia citations suggests we understand what's involved (particles and receptors) but the actual mechanism around encoding of signals seems to be theory. We also can't teach a computer to think, but we still have quite a good idea of how it works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago https://pca.st/episode/835428d6-e13b-4f1b-866c-de9b6a74d660 If your interested this is a good episode of Unexplainable. They can do better then me. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Redfox8@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I believe the receptor cell responds to a particular part of the molecule in question. Artificial flavourings and scents have identical (or similar enough) parts to trigger the same response, but are otherwise different molecules. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I think someone said the number of combinations for a key and lock receptor was insurmountable. Don't quote me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago (5 children) Science shit? I dont know....but I wouldn't say that's a good reason to doubt it, for example I don't know how they proved black holes exist but they seem pretty confident. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (4 children) Ok, if it's just particles how does it distinguish the particles on a molecular level. This is important shit. The closest science can do is gas chromatography and that's an instrument which exists in any reputable lab. Also, using gas chromatography for this a far cry from the simple function of our sense of smell which can distinguish scents just by simply introducing a fragrence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe I'm misreading your tone, but I'm not trying to argue with you - I'm genuinely curious about this and if you have superior knowledge I'm open! My understanding from a quick skim of Wikipedia citations suggests we understand what's involved (particles and receptors) but the actual mechanism around encoding of signals seems to be theory. We also can't teach a computer to think, but we still have quite a good idea of how it works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago https://pca.st/episode/835428d6-e13b-4f1b-866c-de9b6a74d660 If your interested this is a good episode of Unexplainable. They can do better then me. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Redfox8@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I believe the receptor cell responds to a particular part of the molecule in question. Artificial flavourings and scents have identical (or similar enough) parts to trigger the same response, but are otherwise different molecules. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I think someone said the number of combinations for a key and lock receptor was insurmountable. Don't quote me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* (4 children) Ok, if it's just particles how does it distinguish the particles on a molecular level. This is important shit. The closest science can do is gas chromatography and that's an instrument which exists in any reputable lab. Also, using gas chromatography for this a far cry from the simple function of our sense of smell which can distinguish scents just by simply introducing a fragrence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe I'm misreading your tone, but I'm not trying to argue with you - I'm genuinely curious about this and if you have superior knowledge I'm open! My understanding from a quick skim of Wikipedia citations suggests we understand what's involved (particles and receptors) but the actual mechanism around encoding of signals seems to be theory. We also can't teach a computer to think, but we still have quite a good idea of how it works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago https://pca.st/episode/835428d6-e13b-4f1b-866c-de9b6a74d660 If your interested this is a good episode of Unexplainable. They can do better then me. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Redfox8@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I believe the receptor cell responds to a particular part of the molecule in question. Artificial flavourings and scents have identical (or similar enough) parts to trigger the same response, but are otherwise different molecules. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I think someone said the number of combinations for a key and lock receptor was insurmountable. Don't quote me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe I'm misreading your tone, but I'm not trying to argue with you - I'm genuinely curious about this and if you have superior knowledge I'm open! My understanding from a quick skim of Wikipedia citations suggests we understand what's involved (particles and receptors) but the actual mechanism around encoding of signals seems to be theory. We also can't teach a computer to think, but we still have quite a good idea of how it works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago https://pca.st/episode/835428d6-e13b-4f1b-866c-de9b6a74d660 If your interested this is a good episode of Unexplainable. They can do better then me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago https://pca.st/episode/835428d6-e13b-4f1b-866c-de9b6a74d660 If your interested this is a good episode of Unexplainable. They can do better then me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Redfox8@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I believe the receptor cell responds to a particular part of the molecule in question. Artificial flavourings and scents have identical (or similar enough) parts to trigger the same response, but are otherwise different molecules. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I think someone said the number of combinations for a key and lock receptor was insurmountable. Don't quote me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago I think someone said the number of combinations for a key and lock receptor was insurmountable. Don't quote me. permalink fedilink source parent