1177
The king Bernie Sanders based take. (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
183 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Tweet.

It should come as no great surprise that a Democratic Party which has abandoned working class people would find that the working class has abandoned them. While the Democratic leadership defends the status quo, the American people are angry and want change. And they’re right.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -3 points 2 years ago (14 children)

Endorse an even lesser evil, perhaps even popular good? Why was Kamala the only person in the world that wasnt Trump?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (13 children)

    Because no one else could win.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    She didnt win. Thats literally the only thing you see in her, and even that is not there.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (11 children)

    And what, you think Putin’s favorite Jill Stein would? Cornel West?

    She came far and away the closest.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    With a Bernie endorsement? Without democrats fighting to ban them from even being allowed to run? If progressive voters supported progressive candidates?

    But nah, theres a photo of Jill and Putin in proximity of eachother. And you cant even bother to think of a reason to oppose West.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (9 children)

    There was a zero percent chance them winning, Bernie endorsement or no.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    There was a zero percent chance of Kamala winning. You cant hide behind that electability argument anymore because it turns out the candidate you supported wasnt "electable"

    Oh but youll blame the voters for that one. If only they voted for your candidate they would have won. Well guess what happens if voters voted for my candidate? Yall held your nose and half assed supported a candidate none of you like. Like that was ever gonna beat Trump. Its gonna take genuine support, enthusiasm and belief for a candidate that supports the progressive policies all of us want.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    lol, Harris had like a 100000000000 times better shot of winning than any third party candidate

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    You act like its a lottery instead of a decision voters are making. Anyone can have any odds of winning if the voters say so

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (5 children)

    And how many decades ago did a 3rd party get a single electoral vote?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Yes i am talking about doing things differently than we have been. Its a normal thing in other countries to make such massive changes as electing different parties for the first time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Not going to happen.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Ill continue fighting against you to make it happen

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •