They were doing more than Trump will.

https://qz.com/ftc-probe-grocery-price-surge-consumers-inflation-1851611874

And even if neither of them would fix it - how is that a reason to vote Trump?

Edit:

That's been the logic problem through this entire election.

Yes, Kamala dodged right when many of us wanted her to dodge left. I get that, and it frustrates me as well.

But on ANY issue where they were equally bad policy-wise, how does one look back and forth between Trump and Harris and go "Well, clearly Trump"

Folks act like for any tossup issue between them the obvious advantage is with the racist, convicted felon, rapist, demented, shitbag. Somehow Trump just has to be on the same level as Harris to get the nod, but Harris only does if she miles and miles better on an issue. I just don't get it.

I'd argue that 98% of US voters don't care about Gaza whatsoever. It's a wedge issue for a very small minority but was unlikely to significantly affect the race in the big picture.

Almost everybody I know bitches about the price of groceries (regardless of where they place the blame) but I only know a couple people in the Real/Outside World who regularly talk about the Gaza genocide.

Mmm now explain to me how you were going to get harris to shift on inflation, a position she already signalled she'd fire the most effective agent we have for it. (Khan).

When you wouldnt even be budged on mass murder? God do i dread the conversations about how to fight inflation effectively due to corporate greed. That is a hard and incredibly nuanced conversation with no clear answer. Gaza is easy in comparison.

You'd just blame us for undermining harris over inflation instead of gaza. The topic doesn't matter.

You jnow the most effective way to get people to vote? Give. Them. What. They. Want.

For Michigan it was gaza, for Pennsylvania it was inflation. Sadly your too politically unaware and rather just blame others for not seeing reason than challenging your candidate for their shit platform.