▲ 1062 ▼ Linus Torvalds affirms expulsion of Russian maintainers (www.theregister.com) submitted 2 years ago by moe90@feddit.nl to c/technology@lemmy.world 587 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) I don't think you understood their point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) What did I miss? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jas0n@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) In response to: Moreover, the claim that they can harm the software is unwarranted because it is OPEN and many eyes are on it. The xz attack was an intentional backdoor put into a project that was "OPEN and many eyes are on it." Also, it was discovered due to the way it was executing and not because someone found it in the source. The original assumption has been proven wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Oh, yep I didn't see that. Though definitely more eyes are on Linux than were on xz permalink fedilink source parent
[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) What did I miss? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jas0n@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) In response to: Moreover, the claim that they can harm the software is unwarranted because it is OPEN and many eyes are on it. The xz attack was an intentional backdoor put into a project that was "OPEN and many eyes are on it." Also, it was discovered due to the way it was executing and not because someone found it in the source. The original assumption has been proven wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Oh, yep I didn't see that. Though definitely more eyes are on Linux than were on xz permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jas0n@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) In response to: Moreover, the claim that they can harm the software is unwarranted because it is OPEN and many eyes are on it. The xz attack was an intentional backdoor put into a project that was "OPEN and many eyes are on it." Also, it was discovered due to the way it was executing and not because someone found it in the source. The original assumption has been proven wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Oh, yep I didn't see that. Though definitely more eyes are on Linux than were on xz permalink fedilink source parent
[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Oh, yep I didn't see that. Though definitely more eyes are on Linux than were on xz permalink fedilink source parent