Science

13006 readers

15 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

202

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How big kinda depends...

The two limits on superconductor performance are:

It will soon go to National Labs to establish those parameters

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Even if it's useless it's a massive step forwards in superconductor development

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

I guess you could say that even if it has low electric and magnetic capacity it still will have a giant impact on industry. But not all industries.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From what I understand, even if the current and magnetic field of this superconductor are low, it has:

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The original finding was written by experienced chemists, not physicists. There are some problems where solutions are searched for in the wrong directions.
Our current generation of YCBO-based high-temperature superconductors started out as low-field, low-current, highly strain-sensitive, and over 30+ years of engineering development, these now carry >1000 amps/mm^2 in fields as high as 10T (although these numbers trade off against each other). It's a matter of time.