this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
102 points (93.2% liked)

World News

38970 readers
2080 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Alt title: 3 Old White Men Discover Colonialsm Bad

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

My dude, generations historians, economists, and social critics from India and across sub-Saharan Africa have discussed these issues at length. There are libraries full of diverse works on the subject. The erasure of all that is on-brand for the Nobel Prize in Economics (which even Hayek said shouldn't exist in his own acceptance speech) and frankly on-brand for the Western academy as a whole.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

South America also has a huge body of work on this.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The prize is for research in economics, not history or social science. They may be interested in the same topics, but economists usually take longer to reach a conclusion because their work is usually more data-driven.

Hence their conclusions appear to be "not news" to historians and social scientists who already believed the same things without the benefit of economic data.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you'll recall I did mention that postcolonial economists have been discussing this issue.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You did. Is there one economist in particular who you think contributed more to this field than the actual winners?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

We really need to avoid this thinking--again, one of Hayak's concern about this particular prize--that any of it comes down to "one person" or one set of research.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I don't think any field of any research comes down to one person. Nevertheless, academics recognize that some people make greater contributions than others.

This is baked into academia in the form of citation. At the moment you wrote your first bibliography you distinguished those who made significant contributions to your own work. It would have been unacceptable to write an academic bibliography consisting of a single line: "All those who came before".

And even though research is always a collaborative effort, like soccer and filmmaking, it is natural for humans to recognize those who made the greatest contributions. That's why we award MVPs to athletes, Oscars to actors, and Nobels to economists.