▲ 497 ▼ Rich Lives matter (libranet.de) submitted 3 years ago* by fu@libranet.de to c/memes@lemmy.ml 192 comments fedilink hide all child comments But F the poor I guess
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 24 points 3 years ago (1 child) Small correction, it has to do with whether they're citizens or not. But being a billionaire also helps. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml -4 points 3 years ago (1 child) Non-citizen lives don't matter? Do you ever check someone's passport before saving them from drowning? Ridiculous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Obviously not, but as a government body that's what the criteria is permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) This isn't true. This is only a recent politicized phenomena. It never used to happen where people would excuse letting migrants drown. And I highly doubt any government rescue team checks your passport before dumping you back in the water. This only happens because of how highly politicized this issue is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago You're right actually, I can't find a source that says governments have a duty to protect their citizens, so by extension, there's no argument to only use your forces to protect citizens and not non-citizens permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml -4 points 3 years ago (1 child) Non-citizen lives don't matter? Do you ever check someone's passport before saving them from drowning? Ridiculous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Obviously not, but as a government body that's what the criteria is permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) This isn't true. This is only a recent politicized phenomena. It never used to happen where people would excuse letting migrants drown. And I highly doubt any government rescue team checks your passport before dumping you back in the water. This only happens because of how highly politicized this issue is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago You're right actually, I can't find a source that says governments have a duty to protect their citizens, so by extension, there's no argument to only use your forces to protect citizens and not non-citizens permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Obviously not, but as a government body that's what the criteria is permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) This isn't true. This is only a recent politicized phenomena. It never used to happen where people would excuse letting migrants drown. And I highly doubt any government rescue team checks your passport before dumping you back in the water. This only happens because of how highly politicized this issue is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago You're right actually, I can't find a source that says governments have a duty to protect their citizens, so by extension, there's no argument to only use your forces to protect citizens and not non-citizens permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) This isn't true. This is only a recent politicized phenomena. It never used to happen where people would excuse letting migrants drown. And I highly doubt any government rescue team checks your passport before dumping you back in the water. This only happens because of how highly politicized this issue is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago You're right actually, I can't find a source that says governments have a duty to protect their citizens, so by extension, there's no argument to only use your forces to protect citizens and not non-citizens permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago You're right actually, I can't find a source that says governments have a duty to protect their citizens, so by extension, there's no argument to only use your forces to protect citizens and not non-citizens permalink fedilink source parent