you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Homo sapie s are about 300 000 years old

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    phylogenetically "human" does not specifically refer to homo sapiens, but the 'homo' genus as a whole

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So we're going to include the entire genus when discussing social formations? That seems uselessly broad

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    Many different species of the homo genus adopted the same "technology set" of the Acheulean stone making packet, including Homo erectus, Neanderthals, and other early archaic human species. That's a widespread tool set that probably resulted in similar social formations across different human species, and we have lots of archeological evidence for this tool set. Given that such technology is shared across species, I don't think it's uselessly broad to assume there was also shared social formations.

  • source
  • parent