▲ 77 ▼ [YouTube] Redhat goes CLOSED SOURCE? | Chris Titus Tech (www.youtube.com) submitted 3 years ago by SmokeInFog@midwest.social to c/linux@lemmy.ml 75 comments fedilink hide all child comments Potentially this means that Fedora and CentOS stream do not get timely updates implemented in RHEL. Canonical must be throwing a party, and I bet SUSE is not hating it either
[–] animist@lemmy.one 10 points 3 years ago (3 children) Dammit I just got used to Fedora too. Guess I have to go pure Debian now permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Mane25@feddit.uk 26 points 3 years ago (3 children) Fedora is upstream from RHEL, it won't make the slightest bit of difference. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] animist@lemmy.one 4 points 3 years ago That's good to know, thank you! permalink fedilink source parent [–] onepinksheep@kbin.social 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) It's not going to have a direct material effect, but it's going to affect perception. There are already people cautious about corporate influence on Linux, and a Linux distro getting closed like this is going to be seen negatively. While Fedora and RedHat are separate entities, they're close enough for one's perception to rub off on the other. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mane25@feddit.uk 2 points 3 years ago* But it's not "getting closed", that's a misleading headline that people have jumped on all of a sudden, there was no talk of this yesterday when the change was announced. This was the original wording. Nothing is going closed, the way it's published is changing - you might not like the change, but to call it closed source is just deceptive. The worst case (most cynical interpretation of Red Hat's narrative) is that they're trying to make things difficult for Rocky and Alma (which doesn't make much sense to me from their point of view but it's what it looks like). The best case (most charitable interpretation) is that it's a simple rationalisation that could encourage better community integration. Of course if people keep spreading false or sensationalist narrative that might harm their reputation anyway through misinformation (which is kind of what happened with CentOS Stream in my view). permalink fedilink source parent [–] staticlifetime@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago Right. I'm not seeing how this affects Fedora Linux. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Reorder9543@social.fossware.space 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) openSUSE Leap or Tumbleweed is an option if you wanna stick to RPM-based. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ProtonBadger@kbin.social 4 points 3 years ago Yes, SUSE have always been great. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Doll_Tow_Jet-ski@kbin.social 0 points 3 years ago Try MX permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mane25@feddit.uk 26 points 3 years ago (3 children) Fedora is upstream from RHEL, it won't make the slightest bit of difference. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] animist@lemmy.one 4 points 3 years ago That's good to know, thank you! permalink fedilink source parent [–] onepinksheep@kbin.social 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) It's not going to have a direct material effect, but it's going to affect perception. There are already people cautious about corporate influence on Linux, and a Linux distro getting closed like this is going to be seen negatively. While Fedora and RedHat are separate entities, they're close enough for one's perception to rub off on the other. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mane25@feddit.uk 2 points 3 years ago* But it's not "getting closed", that's a misleading headline that people have jumped on all of a sudden, there was no talk of this yesterday when the change was announced. This was the original wording. Nothing is going closed, the way it's published is changing - you might not like the change, but to call it closed source is just deceptive. The worst case (most cynical interpretation of Red Hat's narrative) is that they're trying to make things difficult for Rocky and Alma (which doesn't make much sense to me from their point of view but it's what it looks like). The best case (most charitable interpretation) is that it's a simple rationalisation that could encourage better community integration. Of course if people keep spreading false or sensationalist narrative that might harm their reputation anyway through misinformation (which is kind of what happened with CentOS Stream in my view). permalink fedilink source parent [–] staticlifetime@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago Right. I'm not seeing how this affects Fedora Linux. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] animist@lemmy.one 4 points 3 years ago That's good to know, thank you! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] onepinksheep@kbin.social 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) It's not going to have a direct material effect, but it's going to affect perception. There are already people cautious about corporate influence on Linux, and a Linux distro getting closed like this is going to be seen negatively. While Fedora and RedHat are separate entities, they're close enough for one's perception to rub off on the other. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mane25@feddit.uk 2 points 3 years ago* But it's not "getting closed", that's a misleading headline that people have jumped on all of a sudden, there was no talk of this yesterday when the change was announced. This was the original wording. Nothing is going closed, the way it's published is changing - you might not like the change, but to call it closed source is just deceptive. The worst case (most cynical interpretation of Red Hat's narrative) is that they're trying to make things difficult for Rocky and Alma (which doesn't make much sense to me from their point of view but it's what it looks like). The best case (most charitable interpretation) is that it's a simple rationalisation that could encourage better community integration. Of course if people keep spreading false or sensationalist narrative that might harm their reputation anyway through misinformation (which is kind of what happened with CentOS Stream in my view). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mane25@feddit.uk 2 points 3 years ago* But it's not "getting closed", that's a misleading headline that people have jumped on all of a sudden, there was no talk of this yesterday when the change was announced. This was the original wording. Nothing is going closed, the way it's published is changing - you might not like the change, but to call it closed source is just deceptive. The worst case (most cynical interpretation of Red Hat's narrative) is that they're trying to make things difficult for Rocky and Alma (which doesn't make much sense to me from their point of view but it's what it looks like). The best case (most charitable interpretation) is that it's a simple rationalisation that could encourage better community integration. Of course if people keep spreading false or sensationalist narrative that might harm their reputation anyway through misinformation (which is kind of what happened with CentOS Stream in my view). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] staticlifetime@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago Right. I'm not seeing how this affects Fedora Linux. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Reorder9543@social.fossware.space 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) openSUSE Leap or Tumbleweed is an option if you wanna stick to RPM-based. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ProtonBadger@kbin.social 4 points 3 years ago Yes, SUSE have always been great. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ProtonBadger@kbin.social 4 points 3 years ago Yes, SUSE have always been great. permalink fedilink source parent