you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    If you made it static, sure, but right now you're living compiler error

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    oh well, I'm just starting to learn the language and come from java, so I thought: wait, it can't be static

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    const is more like C++ constexpr, but static is similar to static from C: it's a variable that lives outside any scope. Of course, that means the same static can be accessed by multiple threads, so writing to a static is unsafe (except for types like Mutex, you can safely use those to write, but your static won't be declared mut)

  • source
  • parent