you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

She’s young and doesn’t understand that government doesn’t get fixed in a day.

I'm old and I'm still waiting for the government to be fixed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Abortion was illegal for 70-120 years depending on the state. It was 50ish years from the progressive era and the beginning of birth control to the ruling of Roe. Overturning roe was a 50 year political project by the right.

    Sometimes it takes a lifetime.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    We keep breaking it by voting for Republicans every now and then.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If Democrats ran every branch of the government at every level I still doubt it would get fixed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    California is doing pretty damn good. Not perfect, but head and shoulders above the rest of the country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Exactly: Even if they ran everything they'd do stupid shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    "Nothing is perfect, therefore everything is equally shit."

    What a stupid philosophy. Like all "bothsides" bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That's not what I'm saying at all but don't let that stop you from punching left.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Is the stupid shit Democrats do significantly less stupid than the stupid shit Republicans do?

    If you keep getting punched everywhere you go, it's time for some introspection my friend.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yes, but it's still stupid shit that will get done in my name, with my money, that I have no power to prevent.

    And in your opinion I should be happy about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You're not happy about a significant reduction in stupidity of the people in control of your government?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You're happy about our government still being stupid?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It'll never be smart, because we always demand more of it. Which is fair. Being better than the average, being better than before, and moving in the right direction are all excellent things that we should be happy about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I've come to accept that the best I can ever hope for from our government is that it's marginally better than it was before. As long as I don't look too close at the details to find the ratfuckery or corruption or red tape.

    But I refuse to be happy about it the fact that government will always be stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Improvement is good and should be appreciated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (4 children)

    In what way is CA doing 'pretty damn good'..?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    You live under a rock or something?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    I mean it guess they're not banning books or switching to school vouchers but I'm pretty sure low income households are doing just as bad if not worse over there

    Aren't they, like, tearing down homeless encampments on a monthly basis?

    edit: spelling

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Guess you have been living under a rock. Strong economy AND strong worker protections, lots of unions, high minimum wage, robust anti-discrimination laws, there's countless things that make life in California better for low income households.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Gee, I can't imagine what motivation you would have to cherry pick stats to try and make California look bad

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Lol, those are bellwether economic statistics for any state, it's not 'cherry picking'.

    Capital D democrats love California because it's a democratic stronghold and a testing ground for all kinds of liberal policy, but it's also dominated by capital interests. In terms of GDP it represents 1/6th of the entire US economy.

    It's one of the clearest examples of liberalism's relationship with capital. Most socialists would not look fondly on California governance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Uh huh

    We both know you hate California because all you ever do is attack Democrats. There are dozens of "bellwether economic indicators" and California is doing excellent on most of them. Of course you'd pick a couple of bad ones because you have an agenda.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Well I do attack democrats an awful lot, but not because they're any kind of model of leftist governance

    Those are the metrics any leftist would be interested in with any highly developed state or economy. How distributed is the wealth? Are low-earners able to afford a comparative standard of living? Do they have economic and employment mobility? ect. They look to answer the question, "to what degree is the working class subject to coercive capitalist conditions?"

    Other economic metrics are weighted toward assessing the performance of capital, and are far less relevant to the questions leftists care about answering.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments