you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 2 years ago (12 children)

You are conflating copyright and patents. Copyright is protection for the expression of an idea, like the art design. This is a patent issue, which is a protection of how something works.

If somehow I patent a vague mechanic like "a method of selecting weapons with the directions of an analogue stick or mouse, presented as an 8 direction on screen circle." Then I could sue Red Dead Redemption and Batman Arkham, despite there being no copyright infringement with whatever game I made with that feature.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    Aren't they suing because of the 3d models?? not the design of them but the fact they took Nintendo models and tweaked them???

    If im deadass wrong I will 100% shut tf up and delete my rants.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Aren’t they suing because of the 3d models??

    No, they're not. The word "patent" is used in every single article about this repeatedly. Patents are not the same as copyrights.

    A copyright protects a creative work: A work of fiction, a movie, a character.

    A patent protects the method in which the way a thing functions: A machine, a chip, an algorithm, or in Nintendo's assertion certain vague gameplay concepts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I said this many times before. I was assuming the PATENT they are suing was the base model. Not the design, the base model.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    according to first sentence of article, it was a patent infringement lawsuit, so you are deadass wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    i already admitted to being wrong. Name calling isnt needed anymore

    edit: I LOVE HAVING READING COMPREHENSION ISSUES!!!🩷🩵🩷🩵

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Being called wrong is not the same as being called a name.

    But respect for admitting being wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment