you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 2 years ago (6 children)

IANAL - but I've worked for Big Company and have gone through the patent process a few times. A patent isn't what's written in the supporting text and abstract. It's only the exact thing written out in the claims.

First claim from the patent the abstract is from:

  1. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having stored therein a game program causing a computer of an information processing apparatus to provide execution comprising:

    controlling a player character in a virtual space based on a first operation input;

    in association with selecting, based on a selection operation, a boarding object that the player character can board and providing a boarding instruction, causing the player character to board the boarding object and bringing the player character into a state where the player character can move, wherein the boarding object is selected among a plurality of types of objects that the player character owns;

    in association with providing a second operation input when the player character is in the air, causing the player character to board an air boarding object and bringing the player character into a state where the player character can move in the air; and

    while the player character is aboard the air boarding object, moving the player character, aboard the air boarding object, in the air based on a third operation input.

Exactly everything described above must be done in that exact same way for there to be an infringement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    That seems a bit more easy to get around. It is still crazy to think that you have to check your whole game design against that many patents 😅

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    it's stupid. I'm convinced that people who oversee software patents don't even know what's a computer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Which sounds like mount selection based on if onland==True: landmountlist, else: airmountlist. ??? Can you really patent “I used an if statement to change what the mount button does based on a condition”

    Boy, better fucking patent that fucking pure genius there’s no way anyone could program that without having copied us.

    Like I fucking hope I misread that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    All of the statements in the claim need to be fulfilled - so while that if looks correct it's only a very small part of the actions described. Example:

    in association with selecting, based on a selection operation,[...], wherein the boarding object is selected among a plurality of types of objects that the player character owns;

  • source
  • parent