71
"The Subprime AI Crisis" - Ed Zitron on the bubble's impending collapse (www.wheresyoured.at)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/techtakes@awful.systems
32 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

None of what I write in this newsletter is about sowing doubt or "hating," but a sober evaluation of where we are today and where we may end up on the current path. I believe that the artificial intelligence boom — which would be better described as a generative AI boom — is (as I've said before) unsustainable, and will ultimately collapse. I also fear that said collapse could be ruinous to big tech, deeply damaging to the startup ecosystem, and will further sour public support for the tech industry.

Can't blame Zitron for being pretty downbeat in this - given the AI bubble's size and side-effects, its easy to see how its bursting can have some cataclysmic effects.

(Shameless self-promo: I ended up writing a bit about the potential aftermath as well)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

And in either case, the aura of being a tech company instead of a company is lost

I don't understand this and am kinda afraid of what hides behind this

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    It's about hype and economics.
    Tech companies can theoretically scale well and are valued on the expectation of growth while normal companies are manly valued based on what they currently do. An app can basically be copied for free to millions of users once it has been coded and servers don't cost that much. A traditional company, say a car company, that wants to increase profits has to build a new factory or something. The problems arise when a companies perception goes from startup/tech company to normal company.

    Example: wework was a startup that rented office space long term and lets it customers rent short term from them. Once people realized, that it was a real estate company and not a tech company it's value plummeted, it couldn't raise more capital and went bankrupt.

    Edit: spelling

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    So I should be clear, I dont think theres anything special about Tech companies that should let them be treated differently. But for whatever reason, it is a fact that places like We or Tesla or Theranos or fucking Groupon gets stupid valuations just because they're "tech" adjacent.

    If the market ever catches on that theres no secret ingredient (and as Zitron's shown, there are pretty visible public numbers pointing at this), we're looking at a correction at the trillion dollar scale. Or maybe we never ask Google to put up or shut up, and just keep the fairy powder in our eyes forever.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent