you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -4 points 2 years ago (14 children)
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    But control of the protocol - the definition and development - is still controlled by the for-profit company, right? It hasn't been handed over to a nonprofit governance committee, has it?

    Federation or not, if Bluesky dominates the protocol, they can decide to stop federating and essentially kill the independent servers. Much like what Signal did. Sure, you can run your own Signal server, but without access to the dominant player's market, and using a protocol that's controlled monopolistically, it's practically useless to do so - which is why almost nobody does it anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (6 children)
  • [+] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (4 children)

    Seems to be similar here, you can run PDS (personal instances), but they still rely on a central Bluesky server

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    Yes, that's what the first comment you replied to said

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Is running a pds really equivalent to running your own instance? As I understand it, 2 friends running their own pds cannot federate without the centralized relay which still can't be self hosted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Bluesky has no documentation for running a relay (indexing node). It doesn't seem like they intend to have any documentation on it any time soon. But it is possible to set one up yourself. I don't know anyone that has done so.

  • source
  • parent