▲ 1582 ▼ OpenAI Pleads That It Can’t Make Money Without Using Copyrighted Materials for Free (futurism.com) submitted 2 years ago by flop_leash_973@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 450 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 111 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] CrayonMaster@midwest.social 58 points 2 years ago (1 child) Piracy steals from the rich and gives to the poor. ChatGPT steals from the rich and the poor and keeps for itself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 years ago (2 children) No they shouldn’t. They should cease to exist permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago (2 children) Good luck putting the cat back in the bag. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago I have cats. Putting them back in a bag or box is easier permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well if everyone who’s copyrighted work independently sues OpenAI, that cat will be deceased real quick due to bankruptcy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Fuck copyright they used gplv3 code why isnt it open source permalink fedilink source parent [–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 2 years ago (3 children) Generative AI is not going back into the bag. If not OpenAI, then someone else will control it. So we deal with them the next best way, force them to serve us, the people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ptz@dubvee.org 26 points 2 years ago (1 child) Then they can either pay for the copyrighted data they want to train on or lobby for copyright to be reigned in for everyone. Right now, they're acting like entitled twats with a shit business model demanding they get a free pass while the rest of us would be bankrupted for downloading a Metallica MP3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago Nobody should profit from copyright violation. Yes, copyright law needs to change, but making money isn’t an exception permalink fedilink source parent [–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 years ago Generative AI is not going back into the bag. It probably will, though, once model collapse sets in. That's the irony, really... the more successful it is, the sooner it'll poison itself to death. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CrayonMaster@midwest.social 58 points 2 years ago (1 child) Piracy steals from the rich and gives to the poor. ChatGPT steals from the rich and the poor and keeps for itself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 years ago (2 children) No they shouldn’t. They should cease to exist permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago (2 children) Good luck putting the cat back in the bag. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago I have cats. Putting them back in a bag or box is easier permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well if everyone who’s copyrighted work independently sues OpenAI, that cat will be deceased real quick due to bankruptcy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Fuck copyright they used gplv3 code why isnt it open source permalink fedilink source parent [–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 2 years ago (3 children) Generative AI is not going back into the bag. If not OpenAI, then someone else will control it. So we deal with them the next best way, force them to serve us, the people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ptz@dubvee.org 26 points 2 years ago (1 child) Then they can either pay for the copyrighted data they want to train on or lobby for copyright to be reigned in for everyone. Right now, they're acting like entitled twats with a shit business model demanding they get a free pass while the rest of us would be bankrupted for downloading a Metallica MP3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago Nobody should profit from copyright violation. Yes, copyright law needs to change, but making money isn’t an exception permalink fedilink source parent [–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 years ago Generative AI is not going back into the bag. It probably will, though, once model collapse sets in. That's the irony, really... the more successful it is, the sooner it'll poison itself to death. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago (2 children) Good luck putting the cat back in the bag. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago I have cats. Putting them back in a bag or box is easier permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well if everyone who’s copyrighted work independently sues OpenAI, that cat will be deceased real quick due to bankruptcy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Fuck copyright they used gplv3 code why isnt it open source permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago I have cats. Putting them back in a bag or box is easier permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well if everyone who’s copyrighted work independently sues OpenAI, that cat will be deceased real quick due to bankruptcy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Fuck copyright they used gplv3 code why isnt it open source permalink fedilink source parent
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Fuck copyright they used gplv3 code why isnt it open source permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 2 years ago (3 children) Generative AI is not going back into the bag. If not OpenAI, then someone else will control it. So we deal with them the next best way, force them to serve us, the people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ptz@dubvee.org 26 points 2 years ago (1 child) Then they can either pay for the copyrighted data they want to train on or lobby for copyright to be reigned in for everyone. Right now, they're acting like entitled twats with a shit business model demanding they get a free pass while the rest of us would be bankrupted for downloading a Metallica MP3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago Nobody should profit from copyright violation. Yes, copyright law needs to change, but making money isn’t an exception permalink fedilink source parent [–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 years ago Generative AI is not going back into the bag. It probably will, though, once model collapse sets in. That's the irony, really... the more successful it is, the sooner it'll poison itself to death. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 26 points 2 years ago (1 child) Then they can either pay for the copyrighted data they want to train on or lobby for copyright to be reigned in for everyone. Right now, they're acting like entitled twats with a shit business model demanding they get a free pass while the rest of us would be bankrupted for downloading a Metallica MP3. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago Nobody should profit from copyright violation. Yes, copyright law needs to change, but making money isn’t an exception permalink fedilink source parent
[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 years ago Generative AI is not going back into the bag. It probably will, though, once model collapse sets in. That's the irony, really... the more successful it is, the sooner it'll poison itself to death. permalink fedilink source parent